> > Permissions on mount points don't seem to make much difference. I was able > > to > > mount a filesystem on a mount point with mode 0, and once mounted the > > permissions come from the mounted filesystem, not the mount point. > > While we are at it, is there a rationale for /boot to be root.disk, > group-writeable and set-gid?
If the root inode of the mounted fs overwrites the mount point inode, I'd put permission 0. This way you make things clear for the user.
