"Moore, Paul" wrote: > I disagree. The approach taken by slink was sensible. Have 2.0 as the base, > because it was QA'd to the high standards required by Debian, but include > the latest 2.2 source package for people willing to upgrade. Adding a bit > more support, in the form of including the equivalent of the "Using Kernel > 2.2 with Slink" webpage on the CD, and including (in a separate directory) > debs for the relevant "unstable" versions of packages which need upgrading, > would be enough.
How about make a new source that is just the new kernel + it's requirements? It would have been a lot easier to do 2.2 upgrades if we could have just added deb http:/www.debian.org/~slink22 kernel22-update main to /etc/apt/sources.list to do the upgrade. It seems to work well for the 3.3.x packages vincent maintains for slink. jpb -- Joe Block <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CREOL System Administrator Social graces are the packet headers of everyday life.
