>>"Marcus" == Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Marcus> Making last minute changes and rushing in x.0 versions of
Marcus> critical software is just Plain Wrong. Especially the Linux
Marcus> kernels are often very unstable 'til x.12 or 14.
Why is it bad having a stable kernel installed as default, and
a 2.4-pre kernel, marked as extra, with warning in the long
description, also in the distribution?
We have traditionally allowed our users to make informed
decisions. I see no reason to change now.
If we can, by all means have an 2.3.xx kernel in devel/extra,
with wanrings, and let those who can use it.
The default can be 2.2.15, or something, that is known to be
rock solid.
manoj
--
Do you have exactly what I want in a plaid poindexter bar bat??
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
