> But if we create _debian-user-unstable_, the _debian-user_ readers > would miss (would they care?) the discussions -- some of them > interesting -- about changes, and might therefore be less well > prepared to handle the upgrade to potato when it becomes stable. > > So I obviously can't make up my mind; I think we should let the > _debian-user_ population decide: would you like to split the group?
I don't think it's a good idea to split them up. Many issues discussed in debian-user apply to both stable and unstable, not to mention Linux in general. I like the idea of reading one list and being able to beneift from the experiences of people running both distributions. Occasionally when I want to know more about the "bleeding edge", I'll subscribe to debian-devel for a while and see what's going on. Tom
