On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 09:39:14PM +0200, Federico Di Gregorio wrote:
>       I state my complete lack of interest for tkstep, in both its
> 4.2 and 8.0 incarnations. 4.2 is now obsolete (as tk 4.2 is) and 8.0
> is not kept updated by its upstream author. I use very few tk programs
> myself, so i'd like to find someone to give these packages to. IMHO
> both packages can go out of debian and I will ask the ftp maintainer
> to do that if nobody steps forward in a couple of week to take care of
> them.

I know very little TCL/TK, but I would be annoyed if tkstep8.0 were to
disappear as I find TK to be frustrating to the point of agonizing without
tkstep (It's a little better with, tollerable at least..)

...not a fan of TK.

-- 
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>             Debian GNU/Linux developer
GnuPG: 2048g/3F9C2A43 - 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC  44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3
PGP 2.6: 2048R/50BDA0ED - E8 D6 84 81 E3 A8 BB 77  8E E2 29 96 C9 44 5F BE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
<ahzz_> i figured 17G oughta be enough.

Attachment: pgpr4SFfHHm3J.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to