Your mail is bouncing.
----- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----
Date: 27 Sep 1999 23:14:48 -0000
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: failure notice
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at kitenet.net.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Connected to 203.14.152.114 but sender was rejected.
Remote host said: 550 Access denied
--- Below this line is a copy of the message.
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: (qmail 19669 invoked by uid 500); 27 Sep 1999 23:14:43 -0000
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 16:14:43 -0700
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: a question about BTS severities
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0pre2i
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Herbert Xu wrote:
> Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Similarly, I don't think a bug is grave if it makes a package unusable by
> > just one person in an odd sitution. On the other hand, I think all security
> > and data loss bugs are grave, even if only a few people can trigger them.
>
> I disagree. If a package causes a remote root exploit to be available, even
> if it's only in a very specific configuration, I would say that it is
> critical.
No, it's grave. All security bugs are grave, it's part of the definition of
that priority. And later in my message, I said:
Similarly, I don't think a bug is grave if it makes a package unusable by
just one person in an odd sitution. On the other hand, I think all security
and data loss bugs are grave, even if only a few people can trigger them.
--
see shy jo
----- End forwarded message -----
--
see shy jo
