On Sep 21, Samuel Tardieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Well, IMO, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] should. I see no point in checking signatures if you don't also reject unsigned messages.
-- ciao, Marco
On Sep 21, Samuel Tardieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Well, IMO, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] should. I see no point in checking signatures if you don't also reject unsigned messages.
-- ciao, Marco