On Wed, May 26, 1999 at 02:16:37PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote: > The main thing I don't want to see change is the current "jargon" command. > I'm used to being able to type "jargon foo" and get to the definition of > foo. I don't really care if it continues to use info, or some other viewer, > just so long as the base command stays the same. It seems to easiest way to > manage that would be to use lynx (or sensible-browser if we get that) to > pull up the correct html file.
Just as an aside, wouldn't a "dict foo" work if dictd had a jargon dictionary? -- Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also. ========================================================================= * http://benham.net/index.html <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <>< * * -------------------- * -----------------------------------------------* * Debian Developer, Debian Project Secretary, Debian Webmaster * * <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * * <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * =========================================================================
pgpzOjA8T7b6f.pgp
Description: PGP signature
