On Sun, May 23, 1999 at 01:00:19AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > >>"John" == John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > John> I mean, fix bugs. Then they can be closed. I am aware that > John> not all bugs have easy solutions, but just because the solution > John> isn't easy doesn't mean that it is any less important to fix > John> it. > > And unwanted, and unnecesary, periodic zero content nags help > this process how? Do they help me getting my tough bugs resolved? > What purpose are they serving, then? Why should they not be treated > as any other spam?
What does that treatment involve exactly? Personally I can't see what the fuss is; I'd just delete it if I didn't like it. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB (ex-VK3TYD). CCs of replies from mailing lists are welcome.
