On Fri, May 14, 1999 at 06:17:00PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > The wnpp has become exceptionally incorrect and out of date.
> > 
> > > What can we do as a group to fix this?
> > 
> > One suggestion I just tossed out on IRC is to use the BTS....
> > 
> 
> Hmm, so newbie developer issues a bug against wnpp "ITP foo".  When foo is
> uploaded he either places closes #????? in the Changelog or closes the bug
> by hand.
> 
> Quite nice and takes the need away from having a wnpp maint (mostly).

Also useful:

Package: wnpp
Subject: wnpp: wanted: package
Priority: wishlist

I'd like to see a package of foo, a program that does bar.  It's licensed
under the baz license.

--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>            Debian GNU/Linux developer
PGP: E8D68481E3A8BB77 8EE22996C9445FBE            The Source Comes First!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
<JHM> Being overloaded is the sign of a true Debian maintainer.

Attachment: pgp0egI2iMHPZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to