On Fri, May 14, 1999 at 06:17:00PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > The wnpp has become exceptionally incorrect and out of date. > > > > > What can we do as a group to fix this? > > > > One suggestion I just tossed out on IRC is to use the BTS.... > > > > Hmm, so newbie developer issues a bug against wnpp "ITP foo". When foo is > uploaded he either places closes #????? in the Changelog or closes the bug > by hand. > > Quite nice and takes the need away from having a wnpp maint (mostly).
Also useful: Package: wnpp Subject: wnpp: wanted: package Priority: wishlist I'd like to see a package of foo, a program that does bar. It's licensed under the baz license. -- Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian GNU/Linux developer PGP: E8D68481E3A8BB77 8EE22996C9445FBE The Source Comes First! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- <JHM> Being overloaded is the sign of a true Debian maintainer.
pgp0egI2iMHPZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature