On Fri, May 14, 1999 at 12:17:36PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 1999 at 12:02:32PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > > > Everything seems to build fine according to Tinderbox. Let's
> > > > try another build Josip and see how it works out. If we can't
> > > > get it to build cleanly, I will pull CVS over my phone line at
> > > > home and try building on my Potato system there...
> > >
> > > Currently, I'm having trouble with libIDL, since I needed to 'backport'
> > > the potato orbit packages to slink, so that admins can install it on va.
> > > I'm going to check now, and if they did, I see no reason for newer
> > > builds to fail anymore.
> > >
> > > I will also try building with `$(MAKE) -f config/client.mk` since
> > > apparently everyone else (from mozilla-{builds,unix}) is doing that...
> >
> > What about non i386 builds ?
>
> What about them? The upload will contain source, and you'll be perfectly
> free to recompile it :)
Yes, ...
but mozilla is pretty big, 17MB i think, so the compile will use lots of disk
space and compile time, so i prefer to know if it should work, or if there
should be major problems to it, and not discover after a night's compile time
what went wrong. Also a list of source dependencies would be nice.
Or even to know before i start downloading and compiling that it will not work
anyway.
Also the mozilla web pages are not very informative about non-i386
compilability, but then maybe i didn't search in the right place ...
Friendly,
Sven LUTHER
