Remco van de Meent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Because I, like every other user should do, read the documentation, and thus > read you need util-linux 2.9g. And if it works for you with lower versions, > does it always work? Yes, maybe, no, maybe not. I don't even want to take > the risk of 'yes it works most of the time, but sometimes it doesnt', with > kernel-things.
It's probably worth noting in the package description that this copy is not hacked. 2.9h has a bunch of new code and may or may not be stable (it will take weeks to find out). -- Raul
