Brian White wrote: > Disclamers are of marginal use. It will appear as installable and tell > people to "install me" just as an elevator buttun tells people "push me".
Installing a kernel 2.2 source package just dumps a tar file in /usr/src. I don't see how this could break a system. Actually building and installing that source package is more difficult than pushing an elevator button (even with kernel-package ;-) > Adding a disclaimer is like taking a door with a big, "pull me" handle > and putting a "push" sign above it. The "affordance" of the handle > talks far more loudly than the sign. /usr/src/kernels-source-2.0.tar.gz Adding this file to the distribution really doesn't add a handle to the door. A better analogy would be adding a locked door with a numeric keypad. You have to go hunt in the archives (/usr/doc) to find out the conbination you need to open the door. > There is good reason to have new kernels in "unstable", but we're > talking "stable", here. But keep in mind we're also talking about a _source_package_. -- see shy jo
