On Thu, 21 Jan 1999, Brent Fulgham wrote: >> The issue being that there IS a problem - e.g. are we going to provide >> ppp1 and ppp2? That sounds like trouble to me. >> >Real Question (not a snipe): Is there any reason everyone couldn't use a >current pppd that would be compatible with the new kernel image? Why have >two packages?
I don't see a problem at all: slink includes pppd version 3.3.5, which is fully compatible with the 2.2 series of kernels. This being the case, the kernel-2.2.0 package would simply need to depend on slink's pppd. Not a big deal in the least... anyone running slink would have the required pppd anyway! -ed
