On Wed, 20 Jan 1999, Ben Collins wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 1999 at 09:46:21AM +0100, J.H.M. Dassen wrote: > > > I think that there should be a release critical bug here, but I think it > > > should be #30862: libpam0g depends on cracklib2. > > > > Yup. I've looked at it again, and the dependency is superflous. (I modified > > PAM to link it's .so's to all the libraries they need, and -lcracklib > > slipped in there because I originally looked at enabling cracklib support). > > > > I'm now preparing an upload that'll mark PAM as orphaned. > > Ack! We need pam to be maintained if we want to enable it's use in > potato. I'll take it, if no one intends on doing so themselves.
Another Ack! I'd like to see cracklib support enabled in PAM. Can we coordinate uploads here? I plan on a new upload of cracklib this weekend which will close all existing bug reports. -- Jean Pierre
