>>>>> "Dan" == Dan Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dan> See, it's not "Is anyone going to?" or "Do we agree we
Dan> should?" right now. It's "does anyone but Dan have the time
Dan> to look at http://master.debian.org/~dan and figure out why
Dan> the compiled libstdc++2.8 package whose source is there is
Dan> missing a lot of important symbols". I can't figure it out.
Ben> The source in http://master.debian.org/~dan in the libstdc
Ben> sir is for 2.9. Could this be the problem?
Dan> I present
Dan> http://master.debian.org/~dan/libstdc/libstdc++_2.90.29-1.dsc
Dan> for your enjoyment...
Dan> Notice it says Binary: libstdc++2.8.
Ben> Wow. How does 2.90 compile out to become 2.8?
Dan> The same way egcs 1.1b becomes gcc 2.91.53. The one is an
Dan> interface number and the other an internal version.
Well, I've given this a compile and you're right.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/libstdc]% mysql
mysql: error in loading shared libraries
/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.2.8: undefined symbol: __ti9exception
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/libstdc]% exit
I can't find any mention of anything like this in the libstdc++
sources. Have you mailed the egcd team?
--
Brought to you by the letters T and U and the number 15.
"We are the music makers. And we are the dreamers of dreams." -- Willy Wonka
Debian GNU/Linux -- where do you want to go tomorrow? http://www.debian.org/
I'm on FurryMUCK as Che, and EFNet and YiffNet IRC as Che_Fox.
