Ben Pfaff writes: > What I have heard is that `all rights reserved' is just a generic phrase > used to secure copyright, it doesn't necessarily mean that there isn't a > license that allows you to copy it.
"All rights reserved" was required by a long-obsolete copyright treaty. It is meaningless under the Berne convention. It does no harm here since the subsequent license clearly supersedes it, but it is confusing and should not be used. -- John Hasler This posting is in the public domain. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do with it what you will. Dancing Horse Hill Make money from it if you can; I don't mind. Elmwood, Wisconsin Do not send email advertisements to this address.
