Ok, fine, then please insert a pointer to the patchs in the description, Sorry for that..
But that still leaves the rest of my argument fully intact, and someone stated in past messages that they sent the patchs directly to the maintainer and NOT through the BTS, for a binary only NMU. Zephaniah E, Hull.. On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 08:30:46PM +0100, James Troup wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > binary-only MNU hits only one arch > > > normal NMU hits possible all archs=20 > > > > A binary-only MNU violates the GPL, end of story. > > FUD, FUD, FUD and more FUD. The source changes for our binary-only > NMUs are _always_ sent to the BTS. > > Also, please get over this GPL obsession, there is *plenty* of > software in main _not_ covered by the GPL. > > -- > James > > [Want to know how Debian violates the GPL all the time? Check how > many GPLed packages in Debian have modifications yet don't obey 2(a).] > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
pgpnnbxbf34li.pgp
Description: PGP signature
