FWIW, I ran into the exact same thing today and apt corrected it.

Ben Gertzfield wrote:
> Wow. I was installing some slink packages today with dpkg on
> my hamm system, and I got myself into a wacky situation.
> 
> I'd had the latest hamm versions of libc6 and libc6-dev (2.0.7t-1)
> installed. I installed the slink version of libc6 (2.0.7u-2) without a
> hitch. But then I realized I should have been forced to upgrade
> libc6-dev at the same time!

FWIW, I ran into the exact same thing today and apt corrected it.

> How can this be? How can libc6-dev still be installed and depend on
> libc6 (= 2.0.7t-1) ?

I don't know. :-(

-- 
see shy jo

Reply via email to