On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 04:45:35PM -0500, Havoc Pennington wrote: > On Mon, 12 Oct 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > > Gnome support requires Gtk 1.1 from CVS, so if you want a 1.0-based > version you have to build it separately from the Gnome version.
Mmmh. I mailed to the gtk-- mailing list for clarification of status and future support. Building from CVS would mean we must build gtk-- from CVS. Considering the condition the released packages have quite often, I'd not be too optimistic to get working packages often... (note: despite the brokeness of some releases, let me say that new fixed releases follow really fast... I'm not complaining here). Also, future versions of gtk-- will have gnome support enabled by default, so the question is if we should really seperate non-gnome/gnome. Maybe the really question here is if we also build a "unstable" gtk--, similar to gtk+ 1.0 and gtk+ 1.1? > > Does anybody know if it matters if I build against libungif dev or libgif > > dev? What should I build with? > > > > libungif doesn't have the non-free compression routines. I imagine you > want to build with the same thing the imlib packages are built with. I thought the libs are binary compatible, so you can install either of them? Thank you, Marcus -- "Rhubarb is no Egyptian god." Debian GNU/Linux finger brinkmd@ Marcus Brinkmann http://www.debian.org master.debian.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] for public PGP Key http://homepage.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/Marcus.Brinkmann/ PGP Key ID 36E7CD09
