James A. Treacy wrote: > A number of people would like to see a 3dfx package of mesa. This can > not be done unless there is a legal package of glide (under the > current license I can't even get the libs since I don't own a 3dfx > card).
Any reason, aside from the lack of volunteers, why we can't do what we do with netscape/staroffice/etc.? Even if we can't distribute it, can't we have a loader package? (No, I'm not volunteering, I don't own a 3dfx card either.) -- Chris Waters [EMAIL PROTECTED] | I have a truly elegant proof of the or [EMAIL PROTECTED] | above, but it is too long to fit into http://www.dsp.net/xtifr | this .signature file.
