On Thu, Jun 25, 1998 at 10:29:43AM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> Brandon Mitchell has come up with a better scheme than my "numbering"
> alternative. Consider the following:
> 
> 2.0.8pre1     2.0.8-0pre1
> 2.0.8pre2     2.0.8-0pre2
> 2.0.8           2.0.8-1
> 
> This has several advantages over my previous scheme. It preserves the
> upstream version information in "human readable form". It takes advantage
> of the fact that dpkg will create a source upload for -0 and -1 sequences.
> It naturally maintains the dpkg sequence ordering of the version numbers.
> It doesn't need to use epochs.

It has one disadvantage I can see.  The -0pre looks like it's something it's
not, but I believe people will figure it out, especially if the desc
contained real version info.

Attachment: pgpx7E6JFcyEU.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to