Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Not where 1.0 follows 3.14, for example.
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You clearly can, as I demonstrated in my footnote. No. If your footnote was applicable at all, it was not providing a suffix to the current version number. Instead it was providng a prefix. We already have epochs to provide a prefix. > Anyway, this is obviously somewhat of a religious issue, and having > said that I whole heartedly agree with Manoj (that there are *zero* > technical arguments against epochs), I will now shut up and ignore > this thread. I believe the scope issue constitutes a technical argument. -- Raul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
