[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Dale Scheetz writes: > > In the mean time, unless anyone can object within the next several > > hours, I will construct and upload a new release of glibc with the > > version number: 2.0.7r-1
> I would advise for 2.0.7final instead. IMHO 2.0.7r looks much like an > additional patch-level. Um. f comes before p in the alphabet, whereas r comes after p. 2.0.7final < 2.0.7pre < 2.0.7r > Craig Sanders writes: > > how about using "2.07pre8-1", "2.07pre8-2", and so on for the next set of > > glibc pre-releases? > > Seems like it doesn't work: > > $ dpkg --compare-versions 2.07pre8-1 '<<' 2.0.8 && echo yes || echo no > no You missed a dot out of the first one (should be 2.0.7pre8-1) I'd go and get some sleep, or a coffee, if I were you, Yann ;-) Cheers, Phil. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
