Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [Note: I don't know much about the internals of the BTS; I hope this > will be accurate enough, though] > > * These fields would be named by the codename of the dist > (eg. `hamm_status') - can this be achieved easily ?
Why not just go with something more heirarchical like: Status: (hamm fixed) (bo known-workaround) etc. That way we don't have a potentially ever growing number of fields, just field contents... -- Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP fingerprint = E8 0E 0D 04 F5 21 A0 94 53 2B 97 F5 D6 4E 39 30 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
