Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a poor design. xbase-configure would be more properly called
> xserver-configure, and in slink when I jigsaw the upstream sources
> differen tly there's going to be an xserver-common package where
> xserver-configure, XF86Setup, et al. will go.  It would not prudent to
> engineer such a radical change at this point.  What should I do in the
> meantime?

If it seems to be there, offer the user the option of using it, if it's
not, blot out a message about that when it's available it can be used.

-- 
Raul


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to