Jason Gunthorpe writes: > Hm, we should really talk to the kernel people.. but here is my thoughts, > #1 - If person X compiles a module for kernel x.x.x and it doesn't work > on your compile of x.x.x then you need to recompile your kernel. > [General rule, most modules don't try to deduce what symbols are > available]
Er, why ? Does this mean I cannot choose the exact kernel config I will use, and what patches I apply ? > In the case of alsa I think it should compile for 2.0 and go into the 2.0/ > modules directory that appears to be on my machine. Hm, I quite skeptic. We'll have to have eg. a try at loading the 2.0.33-compiled ones in a 2.0.34 kernel... -- Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Stop making M$-Bill richer & richer, isp-email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | support Debian GNU/Linux: debian-email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | more powerful, more stable ! http://www.mygale.org/~ydirson/ | Check <http://www.debian.org/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
