In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Luis Francisco Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I guess the kernel-maintainer is the only one that can evaluate if
>there are any security improvements that should make it into hamm. Otherwise,
>let's not put new code into the freeze. Debian 2.1 should not take long after
>hamm. I know I'm being quite optimistic here :)
Well, our news server (Diablo, #threehundredsomething in the top1000)
crashed regulary with all the 2.0.x kernels but with the later 2.0.34pre
kernels it has been rock-stable. It has now been running 2.0.34pre16
since it was out, as have most of our other servers. And 2.0.34-release
is just 2.0.34pre16. I'd say it's _more_ stable then any other 2.0.x kernel.
Mike.
--
Miquel van Smoorenburg | Our vision is to speed up time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | eventually eliminating it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
