Hi, what is the reason why in the following sentence in Policy:
,---- | The Depends field should also be used if the postinst, prerm or postrm | scripts require the package to be present in order to run. `---- the word "should" is used, not "must"? I'm asking here (not on -policy) because I assume there must be a technical reason for it, but I really can't think of any. If a package is missing a Depends, and therefore will routinely fail in prerm or postrm --remove, isn't that a release-critical bug? TIA, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
