On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 01:46 +0200, Tristan Seligmann wrote: > On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 17:15:00 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > > Following fortune's model, this is what I'm thinking: > > dosage > > dosage-comics > > dosage-comics-off > > > > See there's no censorship here... > > Where do you draw the line, though? Some people would consider Sexy > Losers the only offensive comic supported by Dosage, while others would > probably consider half of the supported comics offensive or unsuitable > for their children; someone mentioned Something Positive elsewhere, for > example, a comic that hadn't even vaguely occurred to me as one people > might object to.
Which is why, when someone mentioned /etc/dosage/disabled, I said it was a good idea. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson, LA USA PGP Key ID 8834C06B I prefer encrypted mail. "Why should we not accept all in favor of woman suffrage to our platform and association even though they be rabid pro-slavery Democrats." Susan B. Anthony, _History_of_Woman_Suffrage_ http://www.ifeminists.com/introduction/essays/introduction.html
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
