Bob Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> Trying to upgrade via FTP to hamm would be too painfull at 28.8KB!
>
>Hi,
> It depends on your pain threshold, I guess. I thought that too,
>until I started the bo testihng program a little over a year ago.
>Since then I have updated from rex to bo, then bo to hamm, and am
>maintaining a hamm and slink mirror (i386 binary only), all over a
>28.8 link.
I maintain a hamm mirror at work. According to my records, the
traffic to keep hamm up to date amounts to about 20 MB/day.
- Jim Van Zandt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
