On Mon, May 04, 1998 at 05:31:20PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > On Mon, 4 May 1998, Federico Di Gregorio wrote: > > > Hi, > > some time ago I expressed the intent to package fontinst > > (a TeX/LaTeX package). I asked the author about the licence > > and here's what I got. It is not DFSG but we *do* have latex > > in tetex. So is it right for main? Thanx, federico. > > > > ----- Forwarded message ----- > > > > The fontinst package is distributed under the same > > restrictions as LaTeX, ie it should be distributed unchanged. > > Not all of LaTeX in teTeX have this restrictive license. > That's why part of it have been moved to tetex-nonfree in non-free. > > I think most of LaTeX is covered by the special DFSG condition > "The license may require derived works to carry a different name or > version number from the original software.". > > If this applies to fontinst, then it would be ok for main. If it just > forbids derived works, not even under a different name, it surely would > not.
He told me fontinst license is just like LaTeX one: LaTeX's in main so i'llput fontinst there. Thanx, federico > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: 2.6.3ia > Charset: latin1 > > iQCVAgUBNU3fRiqK7IlOjMLFAQHJuAQAkVlzPlDeUJnEd9EU6L6YI0a+ALz0ZD9h > niepHR9xjbqOQjdmT0ILvHmOFxmqz2PEw0BRIcQlSbOKPu4ld0fJGObwhh23yRlZ > SIGJ3VsDZ7Ngvlfmrcfb9uDAVuNe2AZHSdZjlbltD3XtqOOBqoAu33AkHej0qpNE > eNvUc+gbwH4= > =7Qbr > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > -- Federico Di Gregorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org) "Never lost your fine sig in a disk crash? Surely I did!" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
