Peter Pentchev <[email protected]> writes: >> I'm not denying people have other arguments too, including your >> technical/social arguments. > > ...and you did get to the bottom of Guillem's e-mail, right? :) > >> [Guillem Jover <[email protected]> writes:] >> > (BTW and AFAIR most of Sequoia components are either LGPL or GPL.) > > sq's debian/copyright file says LGPL-2+ and GPL-2+. And yes, that is > also true of many of the Rust crates it depends on.
Seqoia PGP is LGPLv2+ after requests, I believe from RedHat and maybe others, but I don't know the full story. It first used GPLv3+ and then GPLv2+ and then LGPLv2+: https://gitlab.com/sequoia-pgp/sequoia/-/blob/main/LICENSE.txt https://gitlab.com/sequoia-pgp/sequoia/-/commits/main/LICENSE.txt Where did you read that sq's debian/copyright says GPL-2+? Compare: https://sources.debian.org/src/rust-sequoia-sq/1.3.1-11/debian/copyright /Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
