Marc Haber <[email protected]> writes: > On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 11:17:13PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: >>I think we should consider using a fixed e-mail address for all these >>packages rather than a per-package maintainer value. > > Please don't. Having [email protected] means that anybody can > subscribe to any package they are interested.
Can't anyone subscribe to the packages they are interested? Just click 'subscribe' button? What's the advantage of [email protected]? > I am not interested in an avalanche of mails from which I am not > interested in 80 % of them. I agree -- thus [email protected] doesn't seem ideal. But some other magic e-mail address? It could even go to /dev/null. It makes grep'ing for DebianCommons-packages more reliable. /Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
