Hallo Andreas, (From #1118722) > Dear Jana, > > Initially I intended to find some additional Uploader inside the > Salvage > team to help you maintaining the package. Since this was not the > case I > think it is the best solution to rather move the package to the > Debian/ > team and set Debian QA Group as maintainer (= orphaning the package). > You are kindly invited to revert this and put your own ID as > Maintainer > again if you intend to keep on maintaining this package. Please let > me > know and I will grant you permissions on this repository. I can also > stop the upload for the next 15 days. > > Kind regards and thank you for your work on this package > Andreas. >
I believe this use of the ITS process is problematic. We’ve discussed this before, so I know you are aware of the concerns [1]. In our last exchange you indicated that you would follow the ITS procedure as intended. [1] #1094788, with further discussion in private mail. I’m bringing this to debian-devel for broader input - both to verify whether my understanding is correct and to see whether others consider using the ITS process in this way (effectively as a route to orphan packages) appropriate. The ITS process was carefully designed [2]. While it’s not immutable and can certainly be updated or improved, changes should follow prior discussion and consensus. It was, however, explicitly not intended to be used for orphaning packages. There was some discussion about creating an Intend To Orphan (ITO) procedure, but (i may have missed it) did not reach a conclusion. Maybe this discussion should be restarted? [2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2018/07/msg00453.html -- tobi (As a note: I’m quite constrained on time at the moment, so I may not be able to engage deeply in follow-ups. But because this issue resurfaced and seems to be a recurring pattern, I felt it necessary to raise it here.)
