Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Oh, foo. Integration of pam was dropped as a release goal of 2.0 > > because it is quite simply not tenable if you want to release hamm > > before 1999. You can not simply recompile core applications like > > shadow and net{base,std} with pam and "hope they work", especially > > not a month+ into freeze. > > I didn't realize that pam was this unstable.
I never said it was unstable and it isn't. But we haven't used it before and I don't care how stable it is, we should not and will not start recompiling core applications with a previously unused (*in Debian*) library, one month into a freeze. The decision to postpone PAM integration till 2.1 was made a long time ago (see the list archives). -- James -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]