Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> writes: > First off, that 127.0.1.1 has to go. There are active changes > underways to change the 127/8 allocation to an 127/24 one, to > free more IPv4 addresses. (Just passing on, don’t talk to me > about this one.)
I assume you're referring to https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schoen-intarea-unicast-127/ ? It proposes 127/16 for the loopback network. So 127.0.1.1 is perfectly fine, even in a distant future after this draft has become an Internet Standard. (Let's not go into a discussion about the draft here. Take that to the IETF if you're interesed. Just wanted to clear up that 127/24 confusion) Bjørn
