Marcelo E. Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alternatives, as I understood them, have to be command line compatible > because a situation like the one I just described is not desirable.
Alternatives have to be command line compatible, but that means you need a defined interface that they all support, not that they're not allowed to have extra functionality available from the command line. Certainly, there's no requirement that emacs have no options beyond those supported by ed, just because they're both available alternatives for "editor". -- Raul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
