[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Raul Miller) wrote on 26.04.98 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Alex Yukhimets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 3. You may copy and distribute the Program (or a work based on it, > > under Section 2) in object code or executable form under the terms of > > Sections 1 and 2 above provided that you also do one of the following: > > ^^^^ > > a) Accompany it with the complete corresponding machine-readable > > source code, which must be distributed under the terms of > > Sections > > 1 and 2 above on a medium customarily used for software > > interchange; > > Note that Sections 1 and 2 do NOT require that all the source be > licensed under the same terms. So what? You can't pick just the parts of the license you like. > I don't see any requirement that all code be relicensed under the > GPL, only a "source code available" requirement (and even then > not always, for proprietary operating systems). > > [I've taken the liberty of not quoting the rest of the stuff which > basically just re-makes this point.] Ah, no. That was the part that made the point that *if you distribute binaries*, you have additional obligations. And Motif only fits if it's part of the OS. Which, for Debian, it isn't. MfG Kai -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
