Am Montag, dem 03.03.2025 um 13:38 -0700 schrieb Soren Stoutner: > Also, as I mentioned elsewhere in this thread, this is not a > discussion about the merits of HTML vs plain text. As long as emails > to the mailing list contain a plain text part, I know of no problem > caused by them also containing an HTML part, which the receiving MUA > is welcome to ignore.
The rules say “Please don't send your messages in HTML,” they do not say “Please also add plain text to your messages.” It bloats up the message. But the more serious problem: Everyone actually has to verify that both message parts have the same content for any important message, which are both signed by PGP. > All of the subsequent emails I have sent as part of this discussion > have been wrapped at 80 characters inline with the current mailing > list code of conduct. They are wrapped in a silly and broken way if you take a look at the message source. Regards
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
