On 2025-02-28 20:24:27 +0900, Simon Richter wrote: > Hi, > > On 2/28/25 19:57, Colin Watson wrote: > > > But seeing two users who seem to have their systems configured this way > > makes me wonder what's going on. Does anyone know of documentation > > somewhere that recommends configuring stable systems this way? > > What is weird is that both have pin priority 500, so I wonder why the newer > version isn't selected. > > The package in stable is also from a point release, so point releases are > available as well. My initial suspicion was "CD-ROM plus security updates", > which I'd find is a somewhat understandable combination that is also broken. > > I'd probably reassign to apt :>
No, according to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1098272 "apt" is fine: I worked around it by just doing 'apt install openssh-server', but that doesn't scale. I'd say that this is rather a bug in unattended-upgrades. BTW, the user still has "Debian Release: 12.6", while the current point release is 12.9. Also, the user says: "the unattended upgrader, which is configured to ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ only install security updates". ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Could this be a misconfiguration of unattended-upgrade? -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Pascaline project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
