Andreas Metzler <ametz...@bebt.de> writes: > On 2025-01-07 Simon Josefsson <si...@josefsson.org> wrote: > [...] > >> I believe this would be good, I frequently run into GnuPG bugs in the >> 2.2.x branch that was fixed years ago in 2.4 and today I mostly these on >> Debian because others moved on to 2.4.x. Andreas, can you give a >> current status of pending issues for experimental->unstable upload? > > Hello, > ... guessing I might be the Andreas in question ... > > Afaik there is no /known/ blocker except for the libgnupg-interface-perl > test error #1088155.
Thanks -- that is good to know! > Should we move to 2.4? 2.4 is not a LTS release and will also EOL in > trixie' soon (2026-06-30). It seems 2.4 is the latest stable branch since 2021, so it looks better than shipping a branch created in 2014-11-06 that had EOL at 2024-12-31. /Simon > 2.6 will be the next LTS release. It has not yet been declared stable > and definitly is an implementation of librepgpg instead of the RFC > blessed version. > > cu Andreas > >
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
