On Fri, 2024-11-22 at 18:00 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Julian Andres Klode (2024-11-22 17:36:17) > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 04:14:59PM +0000, Sune Vuorela wrote: > > > On 2024-11-21, Julian Andres Klode <j...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > As for ports without gpgv-sq, this does not affect them, > > > > they can be served by the gpgv alternative. Once a gpgv-sq > > > > is available, it's important to note that no migration happens > > > > > > To me it looks like we will sligthly grow the base system and have > > > different kind of bugs per architecture depending on availability of > > > rust. > > > > All release architectures support Rust. We should not accept > > release architectures without Rust support. > > > > A minor set of ports architectures does not have Rust support > > yet. > > Rust is unsupported on i386 and patched to silently assume i686 - see > DEP-3 references in this patch for discussions about that, and the patch > itself for a way to more loudly make reverse dependencies aware that > code using SSE2 *must* be compiled without optimizations on i386: > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/rust-wide/-/blob/debian/latest/debian/patches/2001_fail_non-sse2-x86.patch [...]
That's unfortunate. However, I think this a short-term problem. Since we no longer ship an i386 kernel, after the trixie release we should be able to raise the baseline for i386 to include the features that are architectural in amd64. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Any smoothly functioning technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
