On Sun, Nov 24, 2024 at 06:23:00PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > > 5. If we're moving hardware baselines for the sake of Rust (or any other > > software on this architecture) it's already too late. > > Huh? Why?
I think the Andrew's idea in that line is "some software shouldn't be, and some software can't be, in the future i386 port, and changing the baseline won't change that fact for most of that software". As I've just written in my other email, it's unclear to me if doing this, among other things, is indeed useless. > [Putting my Release Team hat off] Personally I think Debian should be > raising the baseline for i386. I'm not sure about to which level, but I've > seen proposals in this thread. > > Given that > 1) we're no longer supporting i386 as a full architecture (no kernel, no > installer, only in chroots or as multiarch) > 2) we don't clearly have i386 porters > maybe we should seek consensus in this thread and go with that. > > [Release Team hat on] I would take consensus for a decision on the topic. (my opinion on this, already stated in this thread, is "match the amd64 one" and I think when we bump the amd64 one we should also bump the i386 one) -- WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
