On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 11:52:38PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Nov 21, Julian Andres Klode <j...@debian.org> wrote: > > > I've just finished more or less, adjusting the APT test suite > > to test gpgv-sq. I plan to upload APT that tests gpgv-sq > > tomorrow. This ensures full compatibility between apt and > > gpgv-sq going forward. > OK, but why? > > Did you make an analysis of how much the size of a minimal system would > change?
We currently see a size increase of 8% (9MB uncompressed, 4MB gzipped) in an essential + apt bootstrap: $ mmdebstrap --variant=essential --include=apt unstable unstable.tar $ mmdebstrap --variant=essential --include=gpgv-from-sq,apt,gpgv- unstable unstable-with-sq.tar $ $ ls -lh unstable*.tar -rw-r--r-- 1 jak jak 114M Nov 22 13:39 unstable.tar -rw-r--r-- 1 jak jak 123M Nov 22 13:39 unstable-with-sq.tar $ gzip unstable*.tar $ ls -lh unstable*.tar* -rw-r--r-- 1 jak jak 46M Nov 22 13:39 unstable.tar.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 jak jak 50M Nov 22 13:39 unstable-with-sq.tar.gz $ diff <(tar xOf unstable.tar.gz ./var/lib/dpkg/status | grep ^Package\\\|Installed-Size) <(tar xOf unstable-with-sq.tar.gz ./var/lib/dpkg/status | grep ^Package\\\|Installed-Size) -U0 diff --git dev/fd/63 dev/fd/62 --- dev/fd/63 +++ dev/fd/62 @@ -29,2 +29,4 @@ Installed-Size: 109 -Package: gpgv -Installed-Size: 509 +Package: gpgv-from-sq +Installed-Size: 14 +Package: gpgv-sq +Installed-Size: 8167 @@ -110,0 +113,2 @@ Installed-Size: 368 +Package: libsqlite3-0 +Installed-Size: 1833 There are a bunch of toolchain/crate-splitting issues here: Rust overlinks, neither do we use all 8MB of the code that's linked into gpgv-sq, nor does it actually need libsqlite3-0. This happens because gpgv-sq uses gpg-sq crate, if they were split up, things should go down quite a bit is my understanding. -- debian developer - deb.li/jak | jak-linux.org - free software dev ubuntu core developer i speak de, en
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
