Hello, On Sat 26 Oct 2024 at 09:31am GMT, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 03:03:53PM +0000, Holger Levsen wrote: >> the current expectation is that an NMU bug is opened, which contains >> the debdiff. >> >> https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/developers-reference.en.html#when-and-how-to-do-an-nmu >> >> "... Then, you must send a patch with the differences between the current >> package and your proposed NMU to the BTS. The nmudiff script in the >> devscripts package might be helpful...." > > FWIW, I think this should stay the default when doing NMUs but I also think > it should be (spelled out that it's) equally fine to open a MR on salsa > *if* the specific package somehow specifies this is ok. > > I also think that currently no package should be able to opt-out from > getting NMUdiffs via the BTS, because it's good to have one workflow which > works for *all* packages. I think so to. -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
