--On Wed, Apr 22, 1998 5:23 pm +0200 "Andreas Tille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 22 Apr 1998, Brederlow wrote: > >> Do you look at ~/ ? Maybe ~/.tedy.xpm should be used if present. :) > That seems me a little bit oversized. To make it more clear what I want to > do: > > xteddy needs four files: > NAME_bw.xbm -> gray if libXpm isn't available > NAME_color.xpm -> the nice Teddy if NAME==xteddy > NAME_icon.xbm -> an icon > NAME_mask.xbm -> the mask shape > > My new version of xteddy can be called via > > xteddy -F<NAME> ... > > If no `-F` parameter is given name equals to xteddy. You have to place > this four files for one pixmap to show instead of xteddy OK. This doesn't answer your question, but as an additional feature request, how about if no -F is given, use argv[0]. So a hard link to xpenguin gets the debian chap, etc... > 1. in the current directory > 2. in the directory defined via PIXMAP_PATH at compile time > May be it makes sense to look for a further PATH to overwrite PIXMAP_PATH > at runtime via environment variable. --- Do you think that this makes > sense? > > How to get the PIXMAP_PATH right, if no --prefix option was given > when invoking configure? (This was the initial question which is > importand for other packages which I intend to package, too.) What does debian's automatic make supply for --prefix? Nothing? Jules /----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------\ | Jelibean aka | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 6 Evelyn Rd | | Jules aka | | Richmond, Surrey | | Julian Bean | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TW9 2TF *UK* | +----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------+ | War doesn't demonstrate who's right... just who's left. | | When privacy is outlawed... only the outlaws have privacy. | \----------------------------------------------------------------------/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
