Hi! On Wed, 2024-10-09 at 19:42:45 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, 2024-10-09 at 10:26 +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > On Mon Oct 7, 2024 at 8:58 AM BST, Marc Haber wrote: > > > P.S.: Isnt it about time to rename exim4 to exim? > > > > Or apache2 to apache?
> The ASF is responsible for a lot more than httpd now, and is also > (gradually) moving away from using the Apache name, so if that package > is to be renamed then something like "asf-httpd" would be better. Ah, I was thinking something similar (re httpd) when reading the original rename proposal, but forgot about the contention on the "apache" name itself. :) While I think a rename would be nice, to avoid confusion that would also imply renaming at least also pathnames (/etc/apache2/, /usr/lib/apache2/, /usr/share/apache2/, /usr/lib/include/apache2/), and package names (libapache2-mod-*, *-apache2), which seems like some work. So better have a good name before embarking on this kind of change (which I'd applaud TBH). Thanks, Guillem
