On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 09:49:24AM +0200, Ansgar đŸ™€ wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 2024-09-15 at 23:07 -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 02:13:26PM +0200, Daniel Gröber wrote:
> If ifupdown's paradigm were working for people we wouldn't be having this
> conversation.
> How else would you move /etc/network/interfaces forward without breaking
> anything?
Just don't. If someone needs to do something new that's supported by a
new tool and not ifupdown, they should just use the new tool.
Hmm, ifupdown has problems assigning addresses for the internet
protocol to interfaces. Is that something "new"? :)
(And AFAIR that includes assigning static addresses to a static
interface due to race conditions.)
It's weird that something that apparently doesn't work, does work for so
many.