On 04/09/2024 17:21, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > Hello, > >> Well, I didn't mean we should *give up* decentralization. I mean we shouldn't >> give up *centralization*. These examples are to prove centralization actually >> works and is quite common, sometimes necessary. > > It would be great if we could run the salsa-ci pipeline localy easily, in > chroot via sbuild or whatever. > Do not get me wrong I like the fact that we have these pipelines in salsa, it > is a great plus for Debian. > > I Just see that the salsa-ci pipelines does not gives somethimes exacly the > same result than my current sbuild + autopkgtest run locally. > So I need to iterate also on salsa-ci to fix my autopkgtests. > > It would be great if the "quality-pipeline" could be decouple from salsa and > could be run locally / salsa / what ever other infra. > > We have plenty of quality tools, but it is not easy to run them all in a row > during the package preparation.
Indeed, thus I wished earlier about delegating salsa CI to debci. Arguably, the reason code forges have such complex, cryptic CI configurations with irreproducible behaviors is the wild number of ways people want to run CI in. But we in Debian already have the One True Way: sbuild and autopkgtest! -- Sdrager, Blair Noctis
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
